BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//hub.inesc.pt - ECPv6.2.8//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://hub.inesc.pt
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for hub.inesc.pt
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Brussels
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20240212T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20240212T173000
DTSTAMP:20260424T003958
CREATED:20231130T133554Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231130T133554Z
UID:12814-1707742800-1707759000@hub.inesc.pt
SUMMARY:Rethink\, reform or replace: How should the EU approach the design of FP10? Private S|B Network series of workshops
DESCRIPTION:Although more than four years away\, the public debate has already begun regarding the structure and orientation of the EU’s next Framework Programme for Research. On February 12\, Science|Business will convene a series of in-depth workshops and debates\, exclusively for members of its international Network\, to develop concrete ideas about how to address some of the key issues which have emerged during Horizon Europe\, and which will undoubtedly influence strategic decisions regarding its successor. \n\n\nPreliminary agenda\n\n\n\n\n\nProgramme\n\n12:00     Registration and buffet lunch \n12:45     Welcome\, Context & Objectives  \n13:00     PARALLEL WORKSHOPS I \n Member-only discussions to develop ideas / sharpen recommendations around: \n Workshop 1: The programme problem \n With new R&I funds and programmes proliferating outside the Framework Programme\, and Horizon’s budget constantly under threat of being raided\, is the idea of a comprehensive\, one-size-fits all Framework Progamme still valid?  Or is it time to invent a totally different structure for R&I funding? \nWorkshop 2: The synergies problem  \nShould Framework Programmes promote science and tech excellence\, or European cohesion? Horizon Europe tries to have it both ways – but few are happy with the results\, and synergies between R&I and cohesion funds seem as elusive as ever. Is it possible to have it both ways\, and if so how? \nWorkshop 3: The selection problem  \nWith AI already transforming the funding landscape\, and the wasted resources of failed applications a longstanding but growing concern\, should we rethink the entire grant assessment and allocation process? After 40 years of frustration\, can anybody come up with a fairer\, simpler way of doing things?   \n14:15     COFFEE BREAK \n14:45     PARALLEL WORKSHOPS II \nMember-only discussions to develop ideas / sharpen recommendations around:  \nWorkshop 4: The defence problem \nAs the world gets scarier\, security is rising in national priorities everywhere\, but questions persist about the EU’s role in developing new military and dual-use technologies. Against this backdrop\, what would be the best way to structure defence R&I – inside or outside the FP\, or left alone to member-states and alliances? \nWorkshop 5: The partnerships problem \nDespite years of prodding\, big European companies still spend less on R&D than US or Chinese counterparts. Meanwhile\, Europe’s large-scale industry-led initiatives have become leviathans\, with SMEs and others struggling to access them. So is there a better way to organise public-private cooperation than partnerships\, and what else could revitalise corporate R&I? \nWorkshop 6: The international problem \nWith geopolitical tensions rising\, strategic autonomy has become a policy meme in Brussels – yet the EU is also seeking new Framework agreements with countries far from Europe. Should FPs be Europe-first or a tool for international diplomacy?  Can these seemingly contradictory goals be reconciled? \n16:00     Transition break \n16:15     Plenary session – Preparing for FP10: How can research and industry support the COM in planning for the future?  \n2024 will be a pivotal year for Europe\, thanks to Parliamentary elections and the appointment of a new Commission – but with political mandates and the implications for R&I as yet unknown\, which foundations need to be laid now to prepare for 2025 and beyond? In this closing plenary\, current EU representatives and Science|Business Network leaders will discuss the way forward and how R&I organisations can most effectively contribute. \n17:15     Close of session
URL:https://hub.inesc.pt/event/rethink-reform-or-replace-how-should-the-eu-approach-the-design-of-fp10-private-sb-network-series-of-workshops/
LOCATION:Brussels
CATEGORIES:In person
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR